Quick Verdict
Use YAML when…
Use YAML for nested, hierarchical configuration with anchors and aliases (Kubernetes manifests, Ansible playbooks, GitHub Actions). YAML's flexibility handles deep structures elegantly.
Use TOML when…
Use TOML for flat, table-based configuration where simplicity and unambiguous parsing matter (package manifests, application config). TOML's syntax is more predictable and harder to misformat.
YAML vs TOML: Feature Comparison
| Feature | YAML | TOML |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax style | Indentation-based | Bracket-based [section] |
| Comments | # only | # only |
| Types | Strings, numbers, booleans, arrays, objects, null | Same + native datetime, integers, floats |
| Anchors/aliases | Yes | No |
| Indentation sensitivity | Critical (whitespace is syntax) | Not sensitive |
| Common ecosystems | Kubernetes, Docker, Ansible, GitHub Actions | Rust Cargo, Python pyproject, Hugo |
When YAML wins
- ✓Syntax style: Indentation-based
- ✓Comments: # only
- ✓Types: Strings, numbers, booleans, arrays, objects, null
When TOML wins
- ✓Syntax style: Bracket-based [section]
- ✓Comments: # only
- ✓Types: Same + native datetime, integers, floats
Frequently asked questions
Which is easier to write correctly?
TOML — its bracket-based syntax is unambiguous and whitespace doesn't matter. YAML's reliance on indentation creates frequent silent bugs (a single space difference changes meaning). For human-edited config, TOML has fewer foot-guns.
Can I mechanically convert YAML to TOML?
For flat structures, yes — tools like `yq | tomlq` or Python `yaml + tomli_w` work cleanly. Deeply nested YAML with anchors doesn't translate cleanly because TOML lacks anchor support; the conversion expands all anchors to their full values.
Ready to convert?
Free, browser-based converters — no upload, no signup required.
More comparisons
View all format comparisons →