Quick Verdict
Use JPG when…
Use JPG for web, social media, email, and any context where file size matters more than ultimate quality. JPG at 85% quality is indistinguishable from TIFF on most displays.
Use TIFF when…
Use TIFF for archival masters, professional print preparation, scientific imaging, and any workflow that needs lossless fidelity for further editing without compounding compression artifacts.
JPG vs TIFF: Feature Comparison
| Feature | JPG | TIFF |
|---|---|---|
| Compression | Lossy DCT | Lossless or uncompressed |
| File size (24MP photo) | ~5–10 MB | ~70–145 MB |
| Bit depth | 8-bit | 8/16/32-bit |
| Layers and alpha | No | Yes (multi-page TIFF) |
| Web compatibility | Universal | None — needs preview |
| Print quality | Excellent at 90%+ | Reference standard |
When JPG wins
- ✓Compression: Lossy DCT
- ✓File size (24MP photo): ~5–10 MB
- ✓Bit depth: 8-bit
When TIFF wins
- ✓Compression: Lossless or uncompressed
- ✓File size (24MP photo): ~70–145 MB
- ✓Bit depth: 8/16/32-bit
Frequently asked questions
Should photographers shoot in JPG or RAW (which converts to TIFF)?
Shoot RAW for maximum editing latitude — RAW converts to TIFF for archival or further editing. JPG is the in-camera processed delivery file. RAW + JPG (most cameras can save both) gives you flexibility plus an instant share-ready file.
Can I convert JPG to TIFF without quality loss?
You can, but the TIFF will only contain the JPG's already-degraded pixel data. Converting JPG to TIFF is sometimes done before editing to prevent further generation loss in subsequent saves — but you can't recover information the JPG already discarded.
Ready to convert?
Free, browser-based converters — no upload, no signup required.
More comparisons
View all format comparisons →