Quick Verdict
Use AVIF when…
Use AVIF when minimizing file size is critical and you control the tech stack — AVIF is 20–50% smaller than WebP at equivalent quality, and all modern browsers now support it.
Use WebP when…
Use WebP for broader compatibility, faster encoding pipelines, and when you need support in slightly older browsers or tools — WebP has been widely supported since 2020 and works in virtually every current context.
AVIF vs WebP: Feature Comparison
| Feature | AVIF | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| Developed by | Alliance for Open Media — based on AV1 video codec (2019) | Google — released 2010 |
| Compression vs WebP | ~20–50% smaller than WebP at equivalent visual quality | Baseline for comparison |
| Browser support | Chrome 85+, Firefox 93+, Safari 16+ (2022) | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari 14+ (2020) |
| Encoding speed | Slow — CPU-intensive, not ideal for on-the-fly generation | Fast — good for server-side image processing pipelines |
| HDR support | Yes — 10-bit and 12-bit color depth | Limited — 8-bit color only |
| Tool support | Growing — Squoosh, Sharp, ImageMagick 7.1+, Cloudinary | Mature — supported by most modern image tools |
When AVIF wins
- ✓Developed by: Alliance for Open Media — based on AV1 video codec (2019)
- ✓Compression vs WebP: ~20–50% smaller than WebP at equivalent visual quality
- ✓Browser support: Chrome 85+, Firefox 93+, Safari 16+ (2022)
When WebP wins
- ✓Developed by: Google — released 2010
- ✓Compression vs WebP: Baseline for comparison
- ✓Browser support: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari 14+ (2020)
Frequently asked questions
Does Safari support AVIF?
Yes, as of Safari 16 (released September 2022). This means AVIF now works across all major modern browsers. If you need to support Safari 15 or earlier, include a WebP or JPEG fallback.
Should I migrate from WebP to AVIF?
If you're optimizing a high-traffic website and can absorb slower encoding, AVIF's smaller file sizes can meaningfully improve page load times. For most teams, the effort/benefit tradeoff still favors WebP for new projects and AVIF as an aspirational target.
Is AVIF better than WebP for all image types?
AVIF excels at photographs and complex scenes. For simple graphics with few colors (icons, logos), the difference is smaller. SVG is still the best choice for vector content regardless of AVIF vs WebP.
Can I use AVIF and WebP with a fallback in HTML?
Yes. Use the HTML <picture> element with multiple <source> elements: AVIF first, WebP second, and JPG/PNG as the final fallback. Browsers pick the first format they support.
Ready to convert?
Free, browser-based converters — no upload, no signup required.
More comparisons
View all format comparisons →