Quick Verdict
Use AIFF when…
Use AIFF for professional audio production and DAW work — it's universally supported by every audio tool on Mac and Windows, with no decoding layer between your audio and the software.
Use ALAC when…
Use ALAC for music library archiving and Apple Music ecosystem — 30–50% smaller files with identical quality, better metadata support, and native iOS/macOS integration.
AIFF vs ALAC: Feature Comparison
| Feature | AIFF | ALAC |
|---|---|---|
| Compression | Uncompressed (PCM) | Lossless compressed |
| Audio quality | Bit-perfect | Bit-perfect (identical to AIFF) |
| File size (4-min song) | ~40–50 MB | ~22–35 MB |
| Metadata | ID3 tags (limited) | iTunes/M4A tags (rich — artwork, lyrics) |
| DAW support | Universal — every DAW natively | Logic Pro native; others vary |
| iTunes / Apple Music | Supported (older format) | Native (Apple's preferred lossless) |
| iOS playback | Yes | Yes (native) |
| Origin | Apple (1988) | Apple (2004) |
When AIFF wins
- ✓Compression: Uncompressed (PCM)
- ✓Audio quality: Bit-perfect
- ✓File size (4-min song): ~40–50 MB
When ALAC wins
- ✓Compression: Lossless compressed
- ✓Audio quality: Bit-perfect (identical to AIFF)
- ✓File size (4-min song): ~22–35 MB
Frequently asked questions
Can I convert AIFF to ALAC without quality loss?
Yes — lossless-to-lossless conversion. FFmpeg: ffmpeg -i input.aiff -c:a alac output.m4a. This produces bit-perfect ALAC from AIFF. XLD on Mac handles this conversion with CUE sheet support and metadata preservation. The decoded ALAC is identical to the original AIFF.
Which is better for Logic Pro: AIFF or ALAC?
AIFF is the traditional choice for Logic Pro as it requires zero decoding overhead and is Logic's native format for recordings. ALAC works in Logic Pro X but AIFF is preferred for session media (samples, recordings). For archived project assets that won't be actively used in sessions, ALAC saves significant storage.
Ready to convert?
Free, browser-based converters — no upload, no signup required.
More comparisons
View all format comparisons →